Hungarian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Hungarian Family Poverty
8.8%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,762,053 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 8.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.69% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants from Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Hungarian Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 82.8% |
| Range | 56.5% | 80.4% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 16.1% |
| Median | 12.1% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 15.6% |
Correlation Details
| Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 356,368,377 | 9.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 85,262,715 | 7.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 21,527,342 | 6.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,528,531 | 7.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 4,026,520 | 7.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 2,206,044 | 7.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 1,786,876 | 8.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,287,827 | 8.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 886,079 | 7.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 447,012 | 5.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 427,361 | 13.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 148,673 | 6.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 145,035 | 11.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 117,194 | 6.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.14% | 60,455 | 6.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 62,861 | 15.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 39,222 | 4.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.69% | 16,528 | 12.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 14,878 | 5.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.72% | 11,475 | 7.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.37% | 3,924 | 7.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 54,892 | 21.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 25,979 | 5.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 18,633 | 2.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.05% | 75,143 | 21.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 1,743 | 10.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.20% | 568 | 6.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.04% | 178 | 7.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.81% | 54 | 7.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 164 | 11.1% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 48,083 | 28.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.80% | 947 | 15.2% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,921 | 12.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.35% | 28,287 | 41.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.60% | 1,102 | 5.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 17.5% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.63% | 64,193 | 21.1% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.29% | 6,460 | 45.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 192 | 6.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.60% | 188 | 20.7% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.88% | 800 | 10.5% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 27.6% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.30% | 871 | 16.7% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,578 | 56.4% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,395 | 39.3% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.06% | 962 | 46.3% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.79% | 315 | 82.8% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.76% | 173 | 7.4% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67% | 60 | 22.2% |