Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Czechoslovakian Family Poverty
8.0%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.39% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants from Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Czechoslovakian Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 32.4% | 23.0% |
| Range | 32.3% | 21.9% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 9.4% |
| Median | 5.3% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 5.2% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,367,138 | 8.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,155,119 | 6.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,425,379 | 6.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 1,939,055 | 6.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 688,213 | 6.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 458,931 | 7.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 215,659 | 6.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 129,611 | 6.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 41,083 | 7.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 31,770 | 9.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 44,725 | 7.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 31,427 | 11.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 17,069 | 6.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 25,085 | 5.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 20,448 | 6.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 11,098 | 10.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,136 | 7.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 9,496 | 14.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,370 | 7.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,336 | 10.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,719 | 5.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 3,785 | 7.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 3,121 | 7.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,396 | 13.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 474 | 8.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,031 | 14.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 5,774 | 1.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 20.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 109 | 3.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 52 | 5.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 3,786 | 4.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 3.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 1,886 | 14.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 810 | 4.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 1,000 | 20.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 8.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.39% | 395 | 20.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 11.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 12.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 666 | 23.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 15.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 1.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 19.2% |