Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Alaska Native
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Alaska Natives
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,710,212 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 4.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.7% | 98.7% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 21.3% |
| Median | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 30.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Alaska Natives by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.86%), Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |