Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North America Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from North America
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from North America
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North America Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,351,855 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.749 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 37.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from North America |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.7% | 97.7% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 18.1% |
| Median | 12.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 20.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 20.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Europe (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.12%), English (7.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Irish (7.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |