Chickasaw vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Sri Lankan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Sri Lankans
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 28.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 45.5% |
| Range | 29.7% | 43.2% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 10.8% |
| Median | 12.0% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |