Chickasaw vs Nepalese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Nepalese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Nepalese
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,521,755 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 4.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 28.9% |
| Range | 29.7% | 28.0% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 11.8% |
| Median | 12.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Nepalese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |