Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
8.7%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.21% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Oceania influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Immigrants from Oceania simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.11% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 30.3% |
| Range | 32.1% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 10.9% |
| Median | 6.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 6.0% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Oceania Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 280,889,900 | 9.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 14,097,803 | 7.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 4,711,591 | 6.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 2,220,338 | 8.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 795,713 | 7.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 504,180 | 10.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 633,560 | 9.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 180,983 | 8.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 261,846 | 11.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 79,840 | 7.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.49% | 78,596 | 11.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 208,937 | 11.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.43% | 42,267 | 8.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 4,278 | 10.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.34% | 5,691 | 12.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.93% | 5,914 | 20.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 63,372 | 11.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 15,342 | 18.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.06% | 6,299 | 5.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.45% | 5,221 | 18.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 624 | 4.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.31% | 290 | 16.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 2,174 | 5.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30% | 1,214 | 0.73% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.17% | 1,674 | 17.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.94% | 7,236 | 6.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.36% | 5,411 | 2.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 102 | 30.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 198 | 18.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.76% | 693 | 8.7% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.16% | 398 | 13.8% |