Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Ghana
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Ghana
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,614,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.040%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 31.3% |
| Range | 29.7% | 29.3% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 11.0% |
| Median | 12.0% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |