Chickasaw vs Aleut Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Aleut
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Aleuts
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Aleut Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,739,595 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 14.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Aleut |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 42.9% |
| Range | 29.7% | 40.0% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 14.6% |
| Median | 12.0% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 10.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from South America (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lebanon (9.4%, a difference of 0.19%), German Russian (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (9.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Portugal (9.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Iraqis | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 9.3% |
| Spaniards | 22.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 20.5 /100 | #201 | Fair 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 19.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 9.4% |
| German Russians | 19.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |