Chickasaw vs Cherokee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cherokee
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Cherokee
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 2.3%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
Minimum | 3.7% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 50.0% |
Range | 29.7% | 47.1% |
Mean | 12.7% | 15.7% |
Median | 12.0% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Cherokee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |