Tsimshian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Tsimshian Family Poverty
8.8%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tsimshian and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tsimshian influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Tsimshian simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Tsimshian Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.024% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 75.9% | 22.7% |
| Range | 75.8% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 9.9% |
| Median | 3.1% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.5% | 4.9% |
Correlation Details
| Tsimshian Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 15,404,738 | 8.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 170,216 | 6.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 15,580 | 6.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 3,609 | 6.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 804 | 11.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 1,736 | 7.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 822 | 7.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 838 | 15.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 13,913 | 5.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 8,168 | 7.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 656 | 22.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76% | 361 | 17.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.79% | 546 | 3.9% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.40% | 1,465 | 11.2% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.85% | 1,437 | 10.2% |