Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,019,620 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%.

In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.57%).