Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,175,970 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 3.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 31.7% |
| Range | 29.7% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 12.7% |
| Median | 12.0% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.64%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |