Immigrants from Hungary Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Immigrants from Hungary Family Poverty
8.1%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,324,142 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 8.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.57% in poverty level among families.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Hungary influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Immigrants from Hungary simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Moldova (8.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants from China | 88.1 /100 | #88 | Excellent 8.0% |
Immigrants from Asia | 87.8 /100 | #89 | Excellent 8.1% |
Immigrants from Belgium | 87.8 /100 | #90 | Excellent 8.1% |
French Canadians | 87.8 /100 | #91 | Excellent 8.1% |
Immigrants from Pakistan | 87.7 /100 | #92 | Excellent 8.1% |
Immigrants from Philippines | 87.7 /100 | #93 | Excellent 8.1% |
Immigrants from Moldova | 87.7 /100 | #94 | Excellent 8.1% |
Immigrants from Hungary | 87.5 /100 | #95 | Excellent 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 87.5 /100 | #96 | Excellent 8.1% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 87.4 /100 | #97 | Excellent 8.1% |
Slavs | 87.3 /100 | #98 | Excellent 8.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia | 87.1 /100 | #99 | Excellent 8.2% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 86.9 /100 | #100 | Excellent 8.2% |
Paraguayans | 86.9 /100 | #101 | Excellent 8.2% |
Romanians | 86.8 /100 | #102 | Excellent 8.2% |
Immigrants from Hungary Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary Data | Family Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.014% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 20.1% |
Range | 6.4% | 19.6% |
Mean | 1.3% | 7.4% |
Median | 0.93% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.46% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 4.0% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Hungary Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.014% | 91,677,805 | 10.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.041% | 39,921,708 | 7.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.066% | 29,494,582 | 9.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.099% | 9,990,367 | 6.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 6,971,469 | 7.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 4,566,699 | 6.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 2,667,424 | 5.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 1,925,465 | 7.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 1,907,812 | 6.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 1,053,115 | 8.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 739,797 | 5.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 782,737 | 8.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 415,128 | 8.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 418,452 | 7.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 377,963 | 7.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 548,194 | 9.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 255,684 | 10.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 198,543 | 5.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 106,487 | 4.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 223,496 | 3.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 90,868 | 17.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 125,587 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 88,484 | 5.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 88,723 | 5.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 157,158 | 20.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 67,515 | 6.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 48,171 | 13.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 12,683 | 4.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 58,858 | 5.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 54,328 | 5.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 23,559 | 3.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 1,534 | 1.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 11,332 | 3.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 8,136 | 9.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 6,052 | 7.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 5,353 | 6.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 26,283 | 8.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 22,366 | 2.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 1,846 | 11.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 13,666 | 13.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 21,640 | 3.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 44,489 | 5.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 2,328 | 1.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 31,757 | 1.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 4,752 | 2.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 6,295 | 4.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 4,376 | 2.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 1,540 | 5.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 487 | 3.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 777 | 2.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 2,401 | 9.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.90% | 422 | 3.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 22,701 | 8.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 2,437 | 3.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 5,805 | 3.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 3,037 | 13.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 1,288 | 0.51% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.44% | 246 | 12.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 7,094 | 12.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 129 | 10.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.85% | 1,144 | 10.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 1,613 | 9.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 145 | 8.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 735 | 12.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,075 | 14.1% |