Burmese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Burmese
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Burmese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
11.7%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 75
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,675,487 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 11.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Burmese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Burmese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 within an area, or if Burmese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Jordan (11.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Turkish (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Oceania (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Immigrants from Singapore | 90.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 87.0 /100 | #113 | Excellent 11.7% |
Ukrainians | 86.9 /100 | #114 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 86.3 /100 | #115 | Excellent 11.7% |
Iraqis | 86.3 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Icelanders | 85.7 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 85.5 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Burmese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Data |
Minimum | 0.15% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 53.9% | 32.1% |
Range | 53.7% | 28.8% |
Mean | 12.7% | 12.1% |
Median | 10.6% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 4.7% |
Correlation Details
Burmese Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 191,781,877 | 12.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 109,370,904 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 51,517,779 | 10.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.07% | 34,241,491 | 13.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 17,242,658 | 10.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 13,432,099 | 11.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 8,301,962 | 11.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 5,335,801 | 10.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 3,711,083 | 10.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 7,047,812 | 14.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 2,280,101 | 9.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 1,710,217 | 10.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 1,456,588 | 10.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 1,164,317 | 12.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.50% | 1,025,965 | 8.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 623,333 | 11.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 948,838 | 9.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.43% | 786,572 | 10.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.73% | 259,517 | 11.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 770,434 | 10.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.37% | 328,542 | 14.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 222,469 | 6.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 238,869 | 5.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 240,554 | 14.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.67% | 118,984 | 16.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.87% | 474,161 | 13.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.34% | 92,247 | 15.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 131,725 | 19.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.87% | 264,879 | 9.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.21% | 85,849 | 11.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.52% | 145,508 | 9.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 121,282 | 9.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.12% | 112,156 | 9.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.52% | 26,989 | 14.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.76% | 193,146 | 12.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.03% | 282,578 | 15.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.27% | 40,914 | 9.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 59,410 | 20.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 51,367 | 12.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 22,339 | 14.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 232,287 | 11.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.04% | 49,955 | 9.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.19% | 230,056 | 11.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.57% | 72,859 | 11.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 73,182 | 32.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.44% | 22,723 | 18.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.80% | 152,639 | 14.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.03% | 40,767 | 5.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.71% | 25,382 | 8.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.02% | 24,044 | 21.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.41% | 20,092 | 7.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 32,344 | 8.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.38% | 30,598 | 10.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.58% | 5,495 | 3.3% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.71% | 10,694 | 11.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.45% | 28,984 | 12.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.01% | 39,049 | 13.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.22% | 23,546 | 8.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.48% | 133,518 | 13.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.80% | 22,930 | 18.8% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.51% | 17,110 | 5.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.72% | 43,169 | 24.6% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.19% | 18,564 | 12.5% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.45% | 11,314 | 6.5% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.55% | 5,863 | 7.3% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.89% | 360 | 22.2% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.33% | 4,185 | 6.6% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.89% | 40,462 | 16.7% |