Burmese vs Immigrants from Serbia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Serbia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Serbia
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Serbia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,863,252 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Serbia |
Minimum | 1.8% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 43.2% | 41.7% |
Range | 41.3% | 39.1% |
Mean | 16.0% | 17.8% |
Median | 15.4% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 22.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Serbia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |