British vs Immigrants from Nigeria Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from Nigeria
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
British
Immigrants from Nigeria
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
36.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from Nigeria Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,545,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,424,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 21.2%, a difference of 0.40%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Immigrants from Nigeria |
Minimum | 17.3% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 51.4% |
Range | 82.7% | 50.2% |
Mean | 44.7% | 19.1% |
Median | 34.5% | 19.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 23.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.8% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.4% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.0% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to British and Immigrants from Nigeria by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |