British vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
British
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,545,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,330,182 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia |
Minimum | 17.3% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 39.7% |
Range | 82.7% | 34.8% |
Mean | 44.7% | 23.3% |
Median | 34.5% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.8% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.4% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.0% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to British and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |