British vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
White/Caucasian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
British
Whites/Caucasians
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs White/Caucasian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,545,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,395,051 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 7.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 17.3% | 18.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 38.3% |
| Range | 82.7% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 44.7% | 24.3% |
| Median | 34.5% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 26.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.0% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to British by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |