British vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from Guyana
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
British
Immigrants from Guyana
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from Guyana Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,545,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,103,781 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.48%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Immigrants from Guyana |
| Minimum | 17.3% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 52.6% |
| Range | 82.7% | 52.3% |
| Mean | 44.7% | 19.9% |
| Median | 34.5% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.8% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.4% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.0% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to British and Immigrants from Guyana by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |