Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Select to Compare
Hearing Disability
Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,074,925 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 2.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.13% in percentage of population with hearing disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with hearing disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Japan influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with hearing disability within an area, or if Immigrants from Japan simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with hearing disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants from Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants from Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants from Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants from Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants from Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants from Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants from Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan Data | Hearing Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.077% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 52.8% | 17.2% |
Range | 52.7% | 16.8% |
Mean | 6.7% | 4.2% |
Median | 4.5% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 4.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 2.9% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Japan Percentile | Sample Size | Hearing Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.077% | 253,931,984 | 3.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 53,786,330 | 2.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 16,883,150 | 2.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 5,434,776 | 2.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 3,164,483 | 2.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 1,526,193 | 2.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 1,784,864 | 2.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 825,086 | 2.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 467,342 | 3.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 260,000 | 3.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 192,418 | 2.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 96,647 | 2.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 76,003 | 3.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 179,939 | 2.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 72,977 | 2.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 709,019 | 3.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 168,533 | 2.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 30,305 | 2.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.92% | 34,879 | 4.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 75,182 | 2.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 4,333 | 2.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,697 | 4.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 202,903 | 2.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.01% | 37,151 | 3.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 13,751 | 1.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 767 | 4.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 703 | 5.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 543 | 5.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.09% | 460 | 7.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.24% | 481 | 3.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.66% | 7,280 | 0.47% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.02% | 413 | 5.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 44,152 | 4.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.62% | 348 | 17.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.00% | 100 | 9.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.25% | 281 | 2.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.98% | 27,373 | 4.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 696 | 3.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.23% | 327 | 7.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.27% | 1,690 | 10.1% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.23% | 222 | 5.4% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.78% | 144 | 8.3% |