Arab Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Arab
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Arab Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
16.8%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
34.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,430,772 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 16.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.76% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Arabs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Arabs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Arabs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Arabs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Morocco (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), South American Indian (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uruguay (16.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Kenyan (16.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 43.1 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 42.5 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 16.7% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 35.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 16.7% |
| South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
| Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
| Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
| Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
| Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Arab Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 64.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.9% | 96.3% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 26.3% |
| Median | 10.3% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.4% | 19.7% |
Correlation Details
| Arab Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 193,031,807 | 19.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 125,227,053 | 16.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 72,292,764 | 15.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 38,449,220 | 16.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 15,225,756 | 14.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 10,687,356 | 11.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 6,652,963 | 14.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 3,118,087 | 11.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 1,967,981 | 12.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 2,041,661 | 17.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 900,478 | 12.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 786,603 | 10.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 650,685 | 15.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 414,324 | 14.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 210,805 | 19.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.30% | 376,045 | 13.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.66% | 263,771 | 14.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.26% | 130,376 | 22.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 257,214 | 26.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 197,256 | 17.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.50% | 79,353 | 16.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.87% | 315,311 | 17.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.40% | 26,767 | 50.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 73,917 | 14.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 44,986 | 7.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.42% | 96,749 | 15.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 124,912 | 18.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 144,458 | 26.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 46,979 | 27.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.13% | 36,367 | 24.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.43% | 22,082 | 31.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.55% | 33,174 | 3.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.60% | 72,580 | 25.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.46% | 332 | 78.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.89% | 642 | 12.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 34,046 | 16.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 1,132 | 3.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.22% | 25,278 | 53.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.00% | 6,842 | 17.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.30% | 43,213 | 47.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.80% | 314 | 100.0% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.52% | 27,842 | 51.8% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 32.00% | 12,405 | 27.5% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.47% | 62,474 | 31.4% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.38% | 5,526 | 47.4% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.01% | 108,414 | 34.2% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.98% | 40,392 | 31.6% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.01% | 117 | 80.0% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.71% | 8,919 | 44.1% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.10% | 53,044 | 42.8% |