Immigrants from Western Africa vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,514,917 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Western Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Africa corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 14.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,676 compared to $95,565, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,384 compared to $102,779, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,351 compared to $39,622, a difference of 0.69%), median earnings ($44,893 compared to $46,645, a difference of 3.9%), and median male earnings ($50,940 compared to $54,279, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.80%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.6%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 57.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.4% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.9%).