Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Congo Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Congo
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Congo
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Congo Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,388,915 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,119,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 14.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Congo |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 27.9% | 5.3% |
| Range | 26.6% | 4.3% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 3.0% |
| Median | 3.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 0.77% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from England (3.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (3.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Western Europe (3.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Lithuanian (3.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Yugoslavian (3.3%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lithuanians | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Austrians | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Italians | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yuman | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hungarians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Croatians | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |