Immigrants from Russia vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,473,341 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 88.4 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $40,244, a difference of 29.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $85,899, a difference of 26.6%), and median household income ($96,378 compared to $76,387, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $48,977, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $54,699, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 38.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 34.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.68%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.99%), and family households (63.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 44.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 60.7%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 59.7%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 8th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.4%).