Czechoslovakian vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,877,972 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 55.0 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 30.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $82,736, a difference of 22.5%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $85,294, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $36,424, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $47,448, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $41,448, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 60.7%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 54.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 46.4%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.38%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 96.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 53.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 41.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.16%), female disability (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.4%).