Immigrants from Lithuania vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,370,201 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 125.9 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,053 compared to $85,294, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $82,736, a difference of 38.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $78,911, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $47,448, a difference of 16.0%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $36,424, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $52,072, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 78.9%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 71.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 18.4%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 64.0%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 42.7%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 56.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 52.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.4%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.9%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.76%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 9.1%).