Immigrants from Africa vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,480,972 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 3.1 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $82,736, a difference of 17.6%), median family income ($100,256 compared to $85,294, a difference of 17.5%), and median household income ($83,289 compared to $71,853, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $47,448, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $36,424, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 29.5%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 7.2%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and single female poverty (21.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 19.9%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (62.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.5%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.1%).