Immigrants from Micronesia vs Swiss Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Swiss
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Swiss
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Swiss Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,571,730 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,835,494 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 3.5%, a difference of 2.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Swiss |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 25.0% |
| Range | 7.3% | 24.5% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| Median | 3.7% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Swiss by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Sioux (3.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (3.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Blackfeet (3.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Danish (3.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |