French vs Chippewa Family Households with Children
COMPARE
French
Chippewa
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
French
Chippewa
26.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French vs Chippewa Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 571,388,158 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 26.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,955,892 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 26.7%, a difference of 0.13%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 82.1% | 81.8% |
| Range | 80.6% | 76.8% |
| Mean | 28.2% | 27.1% |
| Median | 26.1% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.2% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.6% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to French and Chippewa by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Zaire (26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Somali (26.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Denmark (26.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (26.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Eastern European (26.7%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Taiwanese (26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belgium (26.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Russia (26.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 1.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 1.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 1.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 1.0 /100 | #262 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 1.0 /100 | #263 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Taiwanese | 0.9 /100 | #264 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.9 /100 | #265 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Maltese | 0.9 /100 | #266 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.9 /100 | #267 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.9 /100 | #268 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.8 /100 | #269 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.7 /100 | #270 | Tragic 26.7% |
| French | 0.7 /100 | #271 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Somalis | 0.7 /100 | #272 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 0.6 /100 | #273 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 0.6 /100 | #274 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 0.5 /100 | #275 | Tragic 26.7% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 0.5 /100 | #276 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Celtics | 0.4 /100 | #277 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 0.4 /100 | #278 | Tragic 26.6% |