French vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,292,454 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Immigrants from North Macedonia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $56,503, a difference of 10.3%), median household income ($83,468 compared to $89,741, a difference of 7.5%), and median earnings ($46,296 compared to $49,658, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.93%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $61,175, a difference of 2.5%), and per capita income ($43,685 compared to $45,622, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.4%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and single father poverty (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 18.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 42.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and bachelor's degree (36.5% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%).