Fijian vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,909,566 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of French within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.426. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 45.2 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and French communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 25.2%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $55,350, a difference of 21.4%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $43,685, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $51,230, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $59,656, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $38,457, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and French communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.1%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and French communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and French communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.2%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.4%).