Aleut vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,541,696 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 25.9%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Aleut	Immigrants from China
Minimum	6.6%	1.1%
Maximum	100.0%	24.4%
Range	93.4%	23.3%
Mean	27.1%	12.0%
Median	17.4%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.1%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	34.4%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	21.3%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	22.5%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	22.2%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Kenyan (16.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
South American Indians	35.0 /100 \| #186	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	34.6 /100 \| #187	Fair 16.8%
Arabs	34.5 /100 \| #188	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	32.5 /100 \| #189	Fair 16.8%
Kenyans	32.3 /100 \| #190	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Azores	31.3 /100 \| #191	Fair 16.8%
Immigrants \| Uganda	31.3 /100 \| #192	Fair 16.8%
Aleuts	28.7 /100 \| #193	Fair 16.9%
Spanish	28.6 /100 \| #194	Fair 16.9%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	25.6 /100 \| #195	Fair 17.0%
Celtics	25.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 17.0%
Spaniards	24.9 /100 \| #197	Fair 17.0%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	22.6 /100 \| #198	Fair 17.1%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	22.4 /100 \| #199	Fair 17.1%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	21.5 /100 \| #200	Fair 17.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%