Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sub-Saharan Africans

Taiwanese

Tragic
Good
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,592,356 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Taiwanese.
Subsaharan African Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $101,492, a difference of 20.5%), median household income ($77,631 compared to $89,900, a difference of 15.8%), and per capita income ($40,152 compared to $46,455, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $49,804, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $40,576, a difference of 5.7%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $47,902, a difference of 8.6%).
Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricSubsaharan AfricanTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,152
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,748
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,631
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,118
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,408
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,391
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,691
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,235
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,691
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,615
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Excellent
25.1%

Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.3%).
Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricSubsaharan AfricanTaiwanese
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.0%

Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 54.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.3%), female unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSubsaharan AfricanTaiwanese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%

Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSubsaharan AfricanTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.7%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.5%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.60%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSubsaharan AfricanTaiwanese
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.6%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.0%

Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.63%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSubsaharan AfricanTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.9%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricSubsaharan AfricanTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.3%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.9%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.8%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Subsaharan African vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricSubsaharan AfricanTaiwanese
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%