Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Taiwanese

Fair
Good
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,155,689 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.787. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.290% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 290.5 Taiwanese.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $101,492, a difference of 40.6%), median household income ($66,768 compared to $89,900, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $104,180, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $49,804, a difference of 15.1%), wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $40,576, a difference of 18.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 64.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.74%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoTaiwanese
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 40.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoTaiwanese
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Average
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (59.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoTaiwanese
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
29.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 35.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoTaiwanese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%