Cherokee vs Taiwanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Taiwanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Taiwanese
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Taiwanese Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,337,306 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.930. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.823% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 823.2 Taiwanese.
Cherokee vs Taiwanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $101,492, a difference of 25.5%), per capita income ($37,203 compared to $46,455, a difference of 24.9%), and median household income ($72,682 compared to $89,900, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $49,804, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and median male earnings ($48,669 compared to $55,556, a difference of 14.1%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Taiwanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Exceptional $46,455 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Exceptional $107,295 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Exceptional $89,900 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Excellent $47,902 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Good $55,556 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Excellent $40,576 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Tragic $49,804 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Exceptional $101,492 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Excellent $104,180 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Excellent $62,894 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Excellent 25.1% |
Cherokee vs Taiwanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 49.8%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Taiwanese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Good 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 27.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.0% |
Cherokee vs Taiwanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 53.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Taiwanese |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cherokee vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Taiwanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Cherokee vs Taiwanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.5%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Taiwanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Cherokee vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 50.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Taiwanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Excellent 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Cherokee vs Taiwanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 51.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.51%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Taiwanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Tragic 91.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Good 66.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Excellent 60.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Excellent 47.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 40.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Cherokee vs Taiwanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 57.0%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.0%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.3%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Taiwanese |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |