Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Belarus

Taiwanese

Good
Good
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,158,008 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.931. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.550% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 550.1 Taiwanese.
Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $55,556, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $49,804, a difference of 11.9%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $47,902, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $62,894, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and median household income ($94,399 compared to $89,900, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BelarusTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,303
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,586
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,399
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,043
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,658
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,757
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,743
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,393
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,430
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,162
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 14.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BelarusTaiwanese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.2%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Good
11.0%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.88%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BelarusTaiwanese
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BelarusTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.4%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.0%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.2%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.090%), family households (63.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BelarusTaiwanese
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.6%
Exceptional
29.0%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 48.1%), no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 29.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BelarusTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.3%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.9%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.4%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BelarusTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.3%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.2%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 28.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BelarusTaiwanese
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%