Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,055,150 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.183% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 1,182.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $33,279, a difference of 55.6%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $80,908, a difference of 43.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $75,647, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $47,704, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $52,081, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 86.0%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 79.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 32.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 60.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.7%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 51.4%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.6%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.45, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 96.9%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 86.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.1%).