Canadian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,595,501 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.317% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 316.9 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $33,279, a difference of 37.8%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $80,908, a difference of 31.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $79,816, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $47,704, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $33,806, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 80.2%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 74.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 25.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 57.9%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.7%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 58.2%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.9%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.1%).