Luxembourger vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,738,646 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 29.0 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $33,279, a difference of 37.2%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $80,908, a difference of 31.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $79,816, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $47,704, a difference of 5.6%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $52,081, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 111.1%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 97.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 89.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 21.8%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 73.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 71.2%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 46.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.9%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.45, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 95.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 56.2%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 54.5%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 53.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.7%).