Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,509,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.238% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 238.1 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $33,279, a difference of 39.8%), median family income ($108,161 compared to $80,908, a difference of 33.7%), and median household income ($90,026 compared to $67,879, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,704, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $52,081, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 64.2%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 62.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 24.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 29.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 60.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 59.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 49.7%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 45.7%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (63.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 71.9%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 71.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 52.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.3%).