South African vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Luxembourger
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Luxembourgers
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 0.050%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 10.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 52.1% |
| Range | 92.6% | 41.9% |
| Mean | 23.5% | 21.8% |
| Median | 20.4% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Luxembourgers by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |