South African vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Ugandans
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Ugandan |
Minimum | 7.4% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.6% | 94.5% |
Mean | 23.5% | 23.7% |
Median | 20.4% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |