Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Bangladeshi
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Bangladeshis
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,359,209 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 1.0%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 0.99% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 30.2% |
Range | 34.7% | 28.9% |
Mean | 16.2% | 14.6% |
Median | 15.3% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 18.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Bangladeshis by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Belizean (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bahamas (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from West Indies (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (14.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |