Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Jamaica Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Jamaica
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Jamaica
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Jamaica Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,608,738 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Jamaica |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 35.7% | 55.6% |
| Range | 34.7% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 14.9% |
| Median | 15.3% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Jamaica by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Jamaican (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |