Chickasaw vs Shoshone Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Shoshone
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Shoshone
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Shoshone Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,616,342 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 0.040%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Shoshone |
Minimum | 0.99% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 31.5% |
Range | 34.7% | 25.8% |
Mean | 16.2% | 17.1% |
Median | 15.3% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 23.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Shoshone by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.72%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |