Hungarian Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Select to Compare
Poverty
Hungarian Poverty
12.2%
POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,863,259 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 12.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.47% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hungarians and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hungarians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Hungarians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants from Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
| Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants from Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
| Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
Hungarian Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian Data | Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 56.7% | 64.2% |
| Range | 56.5% | 62.9% |
| Mean | 17.6% | 16.8% |
| Median | 14.7% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.7% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 14.8% |
Correlation Details
| Hungarian Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 357,173,202 | 13.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 85,734,856 | 10.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 21,827,455 | 9.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,700,435 | 10.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 4,089,277 | 9.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 2,276,295 | 9.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 1,846,771 | 11.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,311,104 | 11.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 906,480 | 10.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 462,348 | 7.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 441,412 | 16.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 155,179 | 9.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 148,093 | 15.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 119,616 | 8.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 80,019 | 7.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.75% | 70,597 | 17.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 46,303 | 8.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 27,857 | 13.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.15% | 19,547 | 9.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 12,809 | 11.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.33% | 6,019 | 8.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 55,617 | 28.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 26,068 | 6.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 18,633 | 3.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.06% | 77,181 | 27.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.65% | 2,546 | 14.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.32% | 2,717 | 3.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.04% | 178 | 16.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 795 | 4.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.05% | 7,051 | 1.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79% | 266 | 21.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.42% | 67 | 16.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 48,773 | 34.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 853 | 3.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.21% | 1,713 | 2.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.80% | 947 | 13.1% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.42% | 1,921 | 13.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 5 | 20.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.35% | 28,423 | 45.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.57% | 2,035 | 6.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.53% | 7,385 | 25.5% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.63% | 64,193 | 28.1% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.29% | 6,460 | 53.6% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.04% | 864 | 5.3% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.60% | 188 | 34.6% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.34% | 307 | 4.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.69% | 610 | 2.1% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.88% | 800 | 14.8% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.23% | 258 | 7.0% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.96% | 3,858 | 42.6% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.30% | 871 | 7.8% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95% | 9,578 | 64.2% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.81% | 34,395 | 43.3% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.12% | 1,481 | 38.6% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.79% | 315 | 60.3% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.76% | 173 | 8.1% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.67% | 60 | 6.7% |