Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Liberia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Liberia
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,251,059 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 2.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 35.7% | 42.9% |
| Range | 34.7% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 15.3% |
| Median | 15.3% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Jamaican (14.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (14.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |