Chickasaw vs West Indian Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
West Indian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
West Indians
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs West Indian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,897,912 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | West Indian |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 5.3% |
| Maximum | 35.7% | 32.8% |
| Range | 34.7% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 15.1% |
| Median | 15.3% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and West Indians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Haiti (15.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Comanche (15.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Latin America (15.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Inupiat (15.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 15.1% |