Chickasaw vs Jamaican Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Jamaican
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Jamaicans
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,709,935 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
Minimum | 0.99% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 39.6% |
Range | 34.7% | 36.7% |
Mean | 16.2% | 14.5% |
Median | 15.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 16.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Jamaicans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |